![]() ![]() My goal was to allow link failover between a maximum of 2 devices, one of the 2 links being preferred but less reliable than the other / different speeds (haven't gotten this far, as far as any kind of prioritization). "Perhaps the issue is that I'm abusing how these technologies are supposed to work. When one path fail the BGP process should put the neighbor as iddle or Active and preffer the other path. You can see that even after you shuting down the path, if you check the command show ip bgp sumīoth neighbors will be UP and it shouldn´t be. ![]() It will not work the failover as we expect. you did nothing wrong but the problem is the simulator. Not sure if the configuration of bgp and the vlans is correct it seems that loopback interfaces are often used rather than vlans in the real world, but when I had bgp setup with loopback interfaces, it wasn't possible for the pcs to directly connect through them looked like additional routing / bridging would have been required. PCs are able to ping each other once everything is booted up. (The different speeds eliminates etherchannel as a solution, but this is really just an exercise in learning / curiousity anyway).Ī note on the configs: for some reason, the network line doesn't have the mask, even though I ran the command: network .0 mask 255.255.255.0 Perhaps the issue is that I'm abusing how these technologies are supposed to work. I've only managed to get it to work once, by shutting down port 0/0 on the switch (and I wasn't able to reproduce). Basically I'm expecting to be able to disconnect one of the paths between the pcs, and have bgp automatically update the routing table and activate the remaining available path. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |